Zatca 2nd Phase QR

[Harisul44]

We want to integrate ZATCA 2nd Phase QR? Can you help us?

[GeeSuth]

Hey!
The 2nd phase for E-invoicing need authorize to connect and tested to ZATCA API.
until now we don't get the permission or customer can help us to do a test to API.
for QrCode it's easy to make it compatible with 2nd.
but problems with other fields linked to API result

BTW
Issue will be open to plan it in future

Regards

[OmarHarbi]

Please info us if any update about Api

[naeem5364]

We want to integrate ZATCA 2nd Phase QR? Using C# & Sql Server windows application Can you help us?

[naeem5364]

We want to integrate ZATCA 2nd Phase QR? Can you help us?

Brother do found any information about phase2?

[naeem5364]

Please info us if any update about Api

Brother do found any information about phase2?

[Harisul44]

No, Are you find any solution?

…

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022, 7:24 PM naeem5364 ***@***.***> wrote: Please info us if any update about Api Brother do found any information about phase2? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKS3C4S3H47KN76PILLSTW3V7XKSDANCNFSM5Y2DVGUA> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[naeem5364]

Not yet but created xml invoice that approved on zatca validation

[naeem5364]

No, Are you find any solution?

On Fri, Sep 23, 2022, 7:24 PM naeem5364 @.***> wrote:

Please info us if any update about Api

Brother do found any information about phase2?

—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#3 (comment),
or unsubscribe
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKS3C4S3H47KN76PILLSTW3V7XKSDANCNFSM5Y2DVGUA
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
@.***>

Yes like 50%

[fasilmarshooq]

Hi All,
Whoever is interested in phase 2 please refer https://github.com/azep-engineering/ZatcaHelper , and watch out for the repo we will slowly make the rest of the features open source, if you want access to our full repo please write to us at [email protected].

[ajaybalachandran]

@OmarHarbi @GeeSuth @fasilmarshooq @Harisul44 @naeem5364
Issue 1: Inconsistency in E-Invoicing Statistics

After successfully integrating and following the official documentation provided by ZATCA, I have encountered an inconsistency in the e-invoicing statistics displayed on the Fatoora portal's simulation section. Despite receiving a "status":"PASS", "reportingStatus": "REPORTED" for submitted simplified invoices via the API endpoint "https://gw-fatoora.zatca.gov.sa/e-invoicing/simulation/invoices/reporting/single" and despite receiving a "status": "PASS", "clearanceStatus": "CLEARED" for standard invoices via "https://gw-fatoora.zatca.gov.sa/e-invoicing/simulation/invoices/clearance/single", the total count of submitted documents does not reflect accurately on the portal. This issue persists even after multiple checks over several days. Also, if I submitted and got a successful response from the API as the document is accepted and while checking on the Fatoora statistics page sometimes it is counted in rejected documents. Why is this mismatch happening? If I received REPORTED, CLEARED status with no error or warning messages, can I confirm that my document is submitted and accepted by ZATCA successfully? Please clarify this.

Issue 2: Lack of Clarity on Tax Amount Calculation

Additionally, I seek clarification on the calculation of the total tax amount payable to ZATCA for the submitted and accepted invoice documents. As there is no provision to retrieve this information from the ZATCA side, could you please confirm whether we need to calculate this amount internally based on the submitted invoices? For instance, if five invoices are successfully submitted and accepted, how do we determine the total tax amount owed to ZATCA?

Could someone please clarify these doubts?

[linkit-a7md3li]

Hi All, Whoever is interested in phase 2 please refer https://github.com/azep-engineering/ZatcaHelper , and watch out for the repo we will slowly make the rest of the features open source, if you want access to our full repo please write to us at [email protected].

I am happy to hear that but i only need to watch the signer module.
i have made the whole project but while validation outputs that the issuer name and serial number are wrong in X509 i need the little thing only and if you need something else i will hep you in that
thank you