Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSP Control Implementation constraints development #663

Open
46 tasks
Rene2mt opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
46 tasks

SSP Control Implementation constraints development #663

Rene2mt opened this issue Sep 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Rene2mt
Copy link
Member

Rene2mt commented Sep 9, 2024

This is a ...

improvement - something could be better

This relates to ...

  • the FedRAMP OSCAL Registry
  • the FedRAMP OSCAL baselines
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Content
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP System Security Plans (SSP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Plans (SAP)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Security Assessment Results (SAR)
  • the Guide to OSCAL-based FedRAMP Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M)
  • the FedRAMP SSP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAP OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP SAR OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)
  • the FedRAMP POA&M OSCAL Template (JSON or XML Format)

User Story

As a FedRAMP stakeholder, I need to use FedRAMP's external constraints so that I can make sure my OSCAL SSP control-implementation content is valid in accordance with FedRAMP requirements.

Goals

The goal is to ensure the following FedRAMP validations are either developed as Metaschema-based constraints or dropped.

  • incomplete-all-implemented-requirements
  • extraneous-implemented-requirements
  • leveraged-PE-controls-implemented-requirement
  • control-origination
  • control-implementation-status
  • missing-response-components
  • extraneous-response-description
  • extraneous-response-remarks
  • has-unique-policy-and-procedure
  • incomplete-response-description
  • invalid-implementation-status
  • DNSSEC-described
  • configuration-management-controls-described
  • incomplete-response-remarks
  • implemented-requirement-has-responsible-role
  • implemented-requirement-has-implementation-status
  • implemented-requirement-has-planned-completion-date
  • implemented-requirement-has-control-origination
  • implemented-requirement-has-allowed-control-origination
  • implemented-requirement-has-leveraged-authorization
  • partial-implemented-requirement-has-plan
  • implemented-requirement-has-allowed-composite-implementation-status
  • set-parameter-elements-match-baseline
  • remote-multi-factor-authentication-described
  • set-parameter-elements-match-baseline1
  • implemented-requirement-has-allowed-implementation-status
  • implemented-requirement-has-implementation-status-remarks
  • planned-completion-date-is-not-past
  • planned-completion-date-is-valid
  • uses-correct-param-value

Dependencies

No response

Acceptance Criteria

  • Metaschema-based external constraint is developed

  • External constraint has PASS & FAIL unit tests

  • Unit test content (e.g., valid and invalid SSP) is provided

  • Constraints testing harness produces expected results when unit tests are run

  • The constraint is documented and mentioned in the https://automate.fedramp.gov/documentation site (confirm by reviewing SSP sub-pages)

  • All FedRAMP Documents Related to OSCAL Adoption (https://github.com/GSA/fedramp-automation) affected by the changes in this issue have been updated.

  • A Pull Request (PR) is submitted that fully addresses the goals of this User Story. This issue is referenced in the PR.

Other information

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: 🔖 Ready
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant