Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
I tihnk we should remove this line entirely. We currently don't have a need for this relationship (or else we would have sorted this by now 😅 ) and we probably shouldn't be adding relationships in the schema until we find a need for them. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
-
Closing in favour or issue #12243. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Is there an issue associated with this TODO? Is the code still needed or can it be removed?
gc-digital-talent/api/graphql/schema.graphql
Line 236 in 4aae3b4
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions