Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rewrite, with a static-site generator #5

Open
resynth1943 opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 22 comments
Open

Rewrite, with a static-site generator #5

resynth1943 opened this issue Aug 2, 2020 · 22 comments

Comments

@resynth1943
Copy link

resynth1943 commented Aug 2, 2020

I have the PHP website cloned locally, and right now... I see no actual reason for running PHP. Perhaps we can drop the PHP interpreter to save some server costs?

How would you feel about rewriting this in a static site generator like Jekyll?

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

(on a side note, the design of the content would be much easier to manage with a static site generator.)

@PrestonN
Copy link
Member

PrestonN commented Aug 2, 2020

I'm not entirely against it, though at the end of the day I don't think there would be any real benefit.

I still need a server to run site analytics. Since Matomo already uses PHP and had to be installed on the server, I just went ahead and used it for the site as well. If there's a way to keep the site analytics then it's something we can look more into.

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

Can't you just host them separately?

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

It's already on a separate domain, so... :P

@PrestonN
Copy link
Member

PrestonN commented Aug 2, 2020

If I did then what would be the benefit of a rewrite? If I already have to pay for a server to host analytics then rewriting the website to save on server costs doesn't really benefit me in any way.

Also you're right that the domain is different, but they're both hosted on the same server.

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

I mean, I didn't realise you were using Matomo too.

I still think a rewrite would be preferable, though. Right now, the design of the site is a bit of a mess, and the developer experience is confusing (for me, at least).

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

(also, it's a good way to spend my time lol)

@PrestonN
Copy link
Member

PrestonN commented Aug 2, 2020

If it's something you'd like to work on I'm more than happy to accept a PR. It just isn't something I think that I'll be working on myself for now.

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

Oh, good. I'll get started, then :D

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

@resynth1943 how far have you gone in rebuilding the website? Just asking in case you need a helping hand, I'd really love to help.

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

@PrestonN please I was just wondering if @resynth1943 has done anything about this issue if not I'd like to take it up

@PrestonN
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure. It isn't something I plan on working on as I'm comfortable with how the site is put together right now, but if it's something that's really desired then please submit a PR and we can discuss it.

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

Hi @alphabet-codes, I have some edits in my local copy. I did plan to do a mini redesign too.

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

@resynth1943 please can you share an insight on what you have right now?

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

@PrestonN I really appreciate your response, I'd love to see what @resynth1943 has pulled up so far so that i won't be reinventing the wheel.

@PrestonN
Copy link
Member

I'm not sure what you're expecting me to show / respond with, this isn't something that I'm working on. I am not involved whatsoever with any work that @resynth1943 is doing.

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

i understand your point @PrestonN

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

I'd work on the project myself then

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

My poor emails... 😅

I'll show it to you tonight.

@AceTheCreator
Copy link

@resynth1943 haven't seen anything yet.

@resynth1943
Copy link
Author

Then wait longer. I'm busy at college.
Have a nice day.

@efb4f5ff-1298-471a-8973-3d47447115dc

Hi @resynth1943 this issue hasn't had any activity for a while now. We are wondering what the status is of this and if this should be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants