pad_reflect broken

[nikopj]

seems the new release (v0.9.18) breaks padding.
before: v0.9.17

julia> using NNlib

julia> x = rand(1:9, 3,3,1,1)
3×3×1×1 Array{Int64, 4}:
[:, :, 1, 1] =
 7  3  2
 1  5  5
 7  7  6

julia> NNlib.pad_reflect(x, (1,0,1,0); dims=1:2)
4×4×1×1 Array{Int64, 4}:
[:, :, 1, 1] =
 5  1  5  5
 3  7  3  2
 5  1  5  5
 7  7  7  6

(@v1.10) pkg> st
Status `~/.julia/environments/v1.10/Project.toml`
  [872c559c] NNlib v0.9.17

after update: v0.9.18

(@v1.10) pkg> st
Status `~/.julia/environments/v1.10/Project.toml`
  [872c559c] NNlib v0.9.18

julia> NNlib.pad_reflect(x, (1,0,1,0); dims=1:2)
ERROR: DimensionMismatch: mismatch in dimension 2 (expected 3 got 1)
Stacktrace:
  [1] _cs
    @ ./abstractarray.jl:1785 [inlined]
  [2] _cshp
    @ ./abstractarray.jl:1771 [inlined]
  [3] _cshp
    @ ./abstractarray.jl:1782 [inlined]
  [4] _cat_size_shape
    @ ./abstractarray.jl:1761 [inlined]
  [5] _cat_size_shape(dims::Tuple{Bool}, shape::NTuple{4, Int64}, X::Array{Int64, 4}, tail::Vector{Int64})
    @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:1761
  [6] cat_size_shape(::Tuple{Bool}, ::Array{Int64, 4}, ::Array{Int64, 4}, ::Vararg{Any})
    @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:1759
  [7] _cat_t(::Int64, ::Type{Int64}, ::Array{Int64, 4}, ::Vararg{Any})
    @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:1800
  [8] _cat(::Int64, ::Array{Int64, 4}, ::Array{Int64, 4}, ::Vararg{AbstractArray{Int64}})
    @ Base ./abstractarray.jl:1995
  [9] cat
    @ ./abstractarray.jl:1993 [inlined]
 [10] pad_reflect(x::Array{Int64, 4}, pad::Tuple{Int64, Int64}; dims::Int64)
    @ NNlib ~/.julia/packages/NNlib/jLaeV/src/padding.jl:275
 [11] pad_reflect(x::Array{Int64, 4}, pad::NTuple{4, Int64}; dims::UnitRange{Int64})
    @ NNlib ~/.julia/packages/NNlib/jLaeV/src/padding.jl:263
 [12] top-level scope
    @ REPL[7]:1

It still works with even padding sizes (i.e. same padding on left and right).

julia> NNlib.pad_reflect(x, (1,1,1,1); dims=1:2)
5×5 Matrix{Int64}:
 5  1  5  5  5
 3  7  3  2  3
 5  1  5  5  5
 7  7  7  6  7
 5  1  5  5  5

perhaps you know the fix @pxl-th ?

The tests should probably be updated to catch this. Right now they only test same padding on left and right.

[pxl-th]

Ah, the problem is when one of the padding values is 0.
I'll push the fix later today, thanks for posting this!

[nikopj]

@pxl-th any chance to fix this soon?

[pxl-th]

Sorry for the delay, should be fixed by #595