Efficiency vs Google's standard bottom?

[thenotoriousrog]

Apologies for placing this as an issue. I don't see a questions section but is there any way of knowing if this is more efficient and faster than the standard Google bottom sheet? Also is there a way to improve the sliding effect speed of the bottom sheet?

[bhargavms]

DISCLAIMER: Highly opinionated response

The google one is feels heavier than this lib, BottomSheetLayout here is just an extension of the standard FrameLayout and we already know that FrameLayout is pretty lightweight,
As for google's "Bottom sheet", they decided to implement it as a layout behaviour which means that one has to import the entire google material design library in order to get access to the coordinator layout and the bottom sheet behaviour, now ask yourself do you want to depend on an entire suite of "material" design components just to have a "bottom sheet" ?

Personally I would recommend you to keep yourself as far away from google and its "design/architecture components" as possible.