You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The old conjunction and disjunction patterns were very useful for dealing with operations that may or may not produce Null, such as raycasts. Now that they're gone, the amount of patterns necessary to null-proof a raycast has fully doubled. Also, as pointed out by DaComputerNerd on the discord, C# and many other languages include operators that work exactly like the old conjunction/disjunction showing just how useful those operations are.
The reimplementation could be as two completely new patterns, or possibly as an alternate functionality for the existing ones based on whether your provide bools or anything else as input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The old conjunction and disjunction patterns were very useful for dealing with operations that may or may not produce Null, such as raycasts. Now that they're gone, the amount of patterns necessary to null-proof a raycast has fully doubled. Also, as pointed out by DaComputerNerd on the discord, C# and many other languages include operators that work exactly like the old conjunction/disjunction showing just how useful those operations are.
The reimplementation could be as two completely new patterns, or possibly as an alternate functionality for the existing ones based on whether your provide bools or anything else as input.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: