Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reimplement Old Conjunction/Disjunction [Suggestion] #326

Open
Robotgiggle opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Reimplement Old Conjunction/Disjunction [Suggestion] #326

Robotgiggle opened this issue Nov 22, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Robotgiggle
Copy link
Contributor

The old conjunction and disjunction patterns were very useful for dealing with operations that may or may not produce Null, such as raycasts. Now that they're gone, the amount of patterns necessary to null-proof a raycast has fully doubled. Also, as pointed out by DaComputerNerd on the discord, C# and many other languages include operators that work exactly like the old conjunction/disjunction showing just how useful those operations are.

The reimplementation could be as two completely new patterns, or possibly as an alternate functionality for the existing ones based on whether your provide bools or anything else as input.

@object-Object object-Object added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 11, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog in Hex Casting Jan 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants