Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typing preconditions in F* reflection typing judgment #58

Open
aseemr opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Typing preconditions in F* reflection typing judgment #58

aseemr opened this issue Aug 3, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
pulse Issues related to the Pulse separation logic DSL

Comments

@aseemr
Copy link
Collaborator

aseemr commented Aug 3, 2023

More of an F* issue, but since the main client of F* reflection typing is Pulse, and the F* change would require some churn in the Pulse checker, making an issue here.

In the typechecker callbacks to check equiv, subtyping, etc., we should require the caller to prove their typing. These calls are wired to the F* unifier that expects only well-typed F* terms.

@tahina-pro tahina-pro added the pulse Issues related to the Pulse separation logic DSL label Sep 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
pulse Issues related to the Pulse separation logic DSL
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants