Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modules with 0 pads confuse BOM #29

Open
Obijuan opened this issue Aug 16, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Modules with 0 pads confuse BOM #29

Obijuan opened this issue Aug 16, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@Obijuan
Copy link
Member

Obijuan commented Aug 16, 2016

Reported by @gh-jmg

Hi Juan,

Using this design as a nice test for kiCad scripts, I notice a couple of things :

b) Some entities are modules with zero pads, so I added a test to skip these. (These can also confuse the BOM ) These may be just dummy place keepers ?

REMARK Skipped doc1 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DOC1 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc7 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc2 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc3 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc10 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DOC3 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc4 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc5 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc6 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc8 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped doc9 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped JPM1 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DOC4 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DOC5 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped G*** (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped REF*** (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DRILL2 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DRILL4 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DRILL3 (has 0 Pads)
REMARK Skipped DRILL1 (has 0 Pads)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant