Sandbox version of the airscore.legapiloti.it website #290
Comments
|
Hey, |
|
The one on my github user account would be great: [email protected] |
|
It's looking good, but it's hanging on "Not Yet Processed" with this data https://airscore.cc/users/track_admin/18# I'll try to get some clean data from the scorer of one of the comp days to see if I can get it uploaded and tested to see if the numbers come out the same! |
|
Hey,
So I see you were able to create comp and area and task. Task is 602 Km long, so probably radiuses are wrong?
Anyway, once Task is ok, you need to fill timings one the task settings page, and when you get to tracks page you should not get any warning advising that some parameter is not correct in task setting.
At that point, you can:
- upload single tracks clicking on upload track
- upload a zip file. Tracks to be associated to pilots should have a filename coded as listed the popup when clicking on Bulk import tracks
- if they fly using Flymaster livetrackings, you can use live track data to create track files directly on server. Every pilot need to have the correct live tracker ID. In Comp settings / tracks, select Flynmaster as source.
Let me know.
Ciao
—
Antonio Golfari
39 347 3701187
***@***.***
… On Nov12, 2021, at 18:26, Julian Todd ***@***.***> wrote:
It's looking good, but it's hanging on "Not Yet Processed" with this data https://airscore.cc/users/track_admin/18# <https://airscore.cc/users/track_admin/18#>
I'll try to get some clean data from the scorer of one of the comp days to see if I can get it uploaded and tested to see if the numbers come out the same!
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#290 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIQBWZLF6D66AX2UFBCBTD3ULVE53ANCNFSM5H43BSRA>.
Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS <https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675> or Android <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub>.
|
|
I've made some more progress... It seems this website might do the job... (I've deleted the completely junk example) I got an FSDB file (whatever that is) and it set up the whole 2019 UK comp in spain. https://airscore.cc/users/comp_settings_admin/9 I have uploaded a set of waypoints and tracks one at a time. (Bulk upload didn't work, but doesn't matter because one at a time is not a problem) Some of the tracks have quality issues with changes in altitude. There needs to be a way to resolve this. I haven't looked at the files, but maybe there are some glitches in some altimeter values that the scorer can inspect and then over-ride. I think it should accept any IGC file and draw it, but set it to a Disqualified flag. (If the track previewer had a panel showing the altitude it would be easy to verify by inspection.) This would give transparency when tracks are too poor or busted airspace. I don't know why this task isn't showing on the public website. I cannot find an option to publish it. If I can solve these issues and get all the flights into the database, the big challenge is to see if the points scores calculated here match the point scores calculated in 2019. This website is great and could be very useful, but the really Minimal Viable Product (MVP) we need to have somewhere is a locally run script that takes a task definition and directory of IGC files, and spits out a table of scores by filename. Everything else apart from this can be done by hand, when all else fails -- which it will! Could such a command line script be derived from this code to be used as a safety backup in the last resort when the crap hits the fan? (I could post this as a separate github issue if it makes sense.) |
|
your comp is visible on the public website you will just need to change the year dropdown to 2019. To accept poor quality IGC files, in competition setup go to the Checks area
in there, you can choose a pre-set of parameters (there is probably only standard on that server) or create your own.
As far as standalone scripts go, it would be possible but the issue would be getting all the parameters to define and setup a task into the scripts - task definition, scoring parameters etc. At the moment, for standalone you are better using FS comp. A lot of the idea behind airscore was that by being online it is easier to manage from a scoring point of view - pilots can potentially upload their own tracks, scorer(s) can operate from anywhere on any device (in Italy we often updated the scoring using a smartphone while out in the filed or out at dinner) and scores can be easily published for all to see. |
|
Okay, I'm starting to get an agreement between these scores and the official release
It's getting pretty close: Taking Gordon's score as an example: Airscore calculated is: Official results are: Remaining input differences are:
I fully endorse the aim to have pilots self-serve their data and get their scores on a clean and efficient website. Unfortunately I'm experienced enough to know how badly things fall apart in the field, and I need a backup plan. If not as a script, this could be an old stable version of FAI-Airscore running on a laptop where I know how to manually enter in and force all the tracks to work, just to give out some scores. Possibly packaged up in some giant one-off AppImage that can be copied onto any available laptop. |
|
@goatchurchprime you may be able to run airscore headless in the field, running it from the command line (not yet documented, see #45). There's fsdb_igc for prepping the track logs before scoring with airscore. The airscore project is swinging the pendulum towards convenience and away from reproducibility. Online airscore scores as-is with whatever version is running on the website at the time. I could theoretically reproduce a comp score running headless if I knew the version to use. @kuaka or @biuti is the version of airscore written to the database alongside a scoring? With FS I could install a version (if running windows) and from the set of input files I would expect to get the same outputs, the same scores. I don't like that FS uses the same XML file for both inputs and outputs or that it litters timestamps throughout as this makes doing a file diff inconvenient with many false positive diffs that are only timestamp changes. FS scores are reproducible if the timestamps are ignored. |
the issue remains that there needs to be a way to get the competition settings into the application. The above points (#45 and fsdb_igc utility) both require the competition to have been previously setup in FScomp.
It is not doing this but it is a very good idea. Would require resolution of #257 and #259 |
|
I'm hitting Server Error 500 issues on https://airscore.cc/competition/9 so stuff always can go wrong. The UK comps have been set for May and August where there will be 60 pilots all waiting for their scores when this happens, so that gives me a deadline. I've decided that the backup plan does not need to be convenient; it just has to work and produce one day of scores from a set of IGC files, even if I it takes me two hours to click the mouse a thousand times to upload the tracks through a local port on ma computer and paste the numbers from a table into excel to add them up. One out-of-date windows exe file derived from this application would be ideal, but it looks technically impossible: So I'm back to trying to get the docker version to work. This means I'll have to make sure there is a linux laptop available with docker already installed. Or use a raspberryPi. Or see if it can work on an Android phone in UserLAnd CypherpunkArmory/UserLAnd#1080 |
What is the action that results in Error 500?
Actually you don't need a linux OS or a raspberry. I use it on Mac (both laptop and home PC) but Docker is available for Windows as well. The nice thing about using docker is tat it makes the application independent from the OS Docker is running on.
Absolutely. I think probably the json file is the place where this info should stay. |
The small UK hang-gliding competitions are looking for an easier way to score their comps. https://hgcomps.uk/books/british-open-series-2021-winners
I'm having trouble getting this docker install of this code to work, but if you had a scratch version of the website that I could try loading IGC files into and play around it would make it a lot easier to find out if this system does what we need.
Also, if this does work, do you have plans to take donations if we were to use this to score our competitions?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: