-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Port to python 3 #1
Comments
I've been trying out ImageD11 etc on Python 3 at the moment. This will probably have to be functional in Python 3 for us to incorporate into our workflows at Diamond. I've made the required changes to the print and split statements, and corrected module changes etc using 2to3. If you have time, any advice would be greatly appreciated! |
I have a fork which was running under python3 but I did not finish debugging it (e.g. results under python3 are not identical to python2) See https://github.com/jonwright/FitAllB/tree/python3 Most of the others should be ported already. |
Note that I prefer to have code which runs under 2.7 - 3.x to make it easier to do those kinds of tests. As I remember 2to3 prevents a lot of things running under python2. There might be a bunch on integer versus real division to sort out with from future imports, etc. |
Hi Jon - I was wondering whether you've made any progress with this Python 3 port internally at the ESRF? There is interest here in creating a site-wide Conda environment based on Python 3.7. We have interest from our Scientific Computing team who might be able to help? |
Hi James, I did not look at it again and got confused about strain tensors in the meantime (FABLE-3DXRD/ImageD11#115), so go ahead. |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: