-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Фикс вывода сообщения об ошибке в условии брэйкпоинта #1438
Фикс вывода сообщения об ошибке в условии брэйкпоинта #1438
Conversation
WalkthroughRecent updates enhance the debugging process by refining control flows and improving error handling across multiple classes. Key changes include the removal of unnecessary methods, improved clarity in breakpoint evaluation, and streamlined state management. These adjustments collectively contribute to a more efficient and maintainable debugging experience. Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (1)
1324-1324
: Verify the impact of resetting_stopManager.LastStopErrorMessage
.The change ensures that the last stop error message is cleared before emitting the
MachineStopped
event. This prevents stale error messages from being sent to event subscribers. Verify that this change does not inadvertently clear necessary error messages in other parts of the application.Verification successful
Verified the impact of resetting
_stopManager.LastStopErrorMessage
.The change ensures that the last stop error message is cleared only after it is used to create the
MachineStoppedEventArgs
, preventing stale messages from being sent to event subscribers without prematurely clearing necessary error messages.
- The reset of
_stopManager.LastStopErrorMessage
is correctly placed after its usage inEmitStopEventIfNecessary
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of resetting `_stopManager.LastStopErrorMessage`. # Test: Search for the usage of `_stopManager.LastStopErrorMessage` in the codebase. Expect: Ensure it is not cleared prematurely. rg --type cs --context 5 '_stopManager\.LastStopErrorMessage'Length of output: 1185
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- src/OneScript.DebugServices/DefaultDebugService.cs (1 hunks)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (3 hunks)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineStopManager.cs (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs
Additional comments not posted (3)
src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineStopManager.cs (2)
Line range hint
1-100
: Verify the impact of removing theContinue
method.Ensure that the removal of the
Continue
method does not affect other parts of the code.
74-99
: Ensure proper error handling for breakpoint conditions.The refactored method consolidates error handling for evaluating breakpoint conditions. Ensure that this does not introduce any unintended side effects.
Verification successful
Ensure proper error handling for breakpoint conditions.
The refactored method consolidates error handling for evaluating breakpoint conditions. The search results confirm that the
ShouldStopAtThisLine
method is being used correctly in theMachineInstance
class, and the refactoring should not have introduced any unintended side effects.
MachineStopManager.cs
: Definition ofShouldStopAtThisLine
.MachineInstance.cs
: Call toShouldStopAtThisLine
.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the refactored method maintains its original functionality. # Test: Check for calls to `ShouldStopAtThisLine` and ensure they handle the new structure correctly. rg --type python -A 5 $'ShouldStopAtThisLine'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the refactored method maintains its original functionality. # Test: Check for calls to `ShouldStopAtThisLine` and ensure they handle the new structure correctly. ast-grep --lang csharp --pattern '$_.$ShouldStopAtThisLine($$$)'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the refactored method maintains its original functionality. # Search for the definition of the `ShouldStopAtThisLine` method. rg --type cs 'ShouldStopAtThisLine' # Search for calls to the `ShouldStopAtThisLine` method. rg --type cs 'ShouldStopAtThisLine('Length of output: 484
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the refactored method maintains its original functionality. # Search for calls to the `ShouldStopAtThisLine` method with corrected regex pattern. rg --type cs 'ShouldStopAtThisLine\(' -A 5Length of output: 1241
src/OneScript.DebugServices/DefaultDebugService.cs (1)
45-45
: Ensure the removal ofPrepareDebugContinuation()
does not impact debugging.The removal of
PrepareDebugContinuation()
simplifies the method but may impact the debugging process. Verify that this change does not introduce any issues.Verification successful
The removal of
PrepareDebugContinuation()
does not impact debugging.The method
PrepareDebugContinuation()
is not defined or referenced anywhere in the codebase, indicating that its removal does not introduce any issues.
- No critical dependencies found.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `PrepareDebugContinuation()` does not impact the debugging process. # Test: Search for references to `PrepareDebugContinuation()` to understand its impact. Expect: No critical dependencies found. rg --type python -A 5 $'PrepareDebugContinuation'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `PrepareDebugContinuation()` does not impact the debugging process. # Test: Search for references to `PrepareDebugContinuation()` to understand its impact. Expect: No critical dependencies found. rg --type cs -A 5 'PrepareDebugContinuation'Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `PrepareDebugContinuation()` does not impact the debugging process. # Test: Search for the definition and usage of `PrepareDebugContinuation()` in the entire codebase. Expect: No critical dependencies found. rg 'PrepareDebugContinuation'Length of output: 29
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the removal of `PrepareDebugContinuation()` does not impact the debugging process. # Test: Search for any comments or documentation that reference `PrepareDebugContinuation()`. Expect: No critical dependencies found. rg 'PrepareDebugContinuation' --type md --type txt --type csLength of output: 60
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ public MachineStopManager(MachineInstance runner, IBreakpointManager breakpoints | |||
public bool ShouldStopAtThisLine(string module, ExecutionFrame currentFrame) | |||
{ | |||
bool mustStop = false; | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Initialize mustStop
directly in the switch-case block.
Initializing mustStop
directly within each case block can make the code more readable and maintainable.
- bool mustStop = false;
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (22 hunks)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineStopManager.cs (5 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineStopManager.cs
@@ -1580,7 +1545,7 @@ private void TrimR(int arg) | |||
{ | |||
if (!Char.IsWhiteSpace(str[i])) | |||
{ | |||
var trimmed = str.Substring(0, i+1); | |||
var trimmed = str[..(i + 1)]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ох, не люблю я эти модно-молодежные магии... @dmpas тебе как?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
А вот зря) range - безапелляционно удобная штука
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IL-код получается в Release абсолютно одинаковый, с вызовом System.String::Substring(int32, int32)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IL-код то я больше чем уверен, что одинаковый, просто я ренжи читать не умею. Придется научиться
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Сокращать так сокращать
private void TrimR(int arg)
{
var str = _operationStack.Pop().AsString();
int i = str.Length;
do { --i; if (i < 0) break; } while (Char.IsWhiteSpace(str[i]));
_operationStack.Push(ValueFactory.Create(str[..(i+1)]));
NextInstruction();
}
int methodId; | ||
IValue[] argValues; | ||
PrepareContextCallArguments(arg, out context, out methodId, out argValues); | ||
PrepareContextCallArguments(arg, out IRuntimeContextInstance context, out int methodId, out IValue[] argValues); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Может на out var
заменить? Еще короче будет
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Да можно. Я без оглядки, по инфо сообщениям студии пробежался, что были
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs (21 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/ScriptEngine/Machine/MachineInstance.cs
Summary by CodeRabbit