Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify xcm_attr_set() on UTLS connection sockets #82

Open
m-ronnblom opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Clarify xcm_attr_set() on UTLS connection sockets #82

m-ronnblom opened this issue Oct 13, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@m-ronnblom
Copy link
Collaborator

The UTLS transport documentation is clear on the fact that xcm_connect() or xcm_accept() results in either a UX or a TLS connection socket, but falsely claims that such connection sockets will accept "non-native" socket attribute (e.g., a UX connection socket will accept "tcp.user_timeout").

The only situation where both UX and TLS attributes, and potentially future UTLS-specif attributes, can be configured on a UTLS socket is at the point where the caller does not know, is at the time of XCM socket creation (e.g., xcm_connect_a()).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant