You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The UTLS transport documentation is clear on the fact that xcm_connect() or xcm_accept() results in either a UX or a TLS connection socket, but falsely claims that such connection sockets will accept "non-native" socket attribute (e.g., a UX connection socket will accept "tcp.user_timeout").
The only situation where both UX and TLS attributes, and potentially future UTLS-specif attributes, can be configured on a UTLS socket is at the point where the caller does not know, is at the time of XCM socket creation (e.g., xcm_connect_a()).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The UTLS transport documentation is clear on the fact that xcm_connect() or xcm_accept() results in either a UX or a TLS connection socket, but falsely claims that such connection sockets will accept "non-native" socket attribute (e.g., a UX connection socket will accept "tcp.user_timeout").
The only situation where both UX and TLS attributes, and potentially future UTLS-specif attributes, can be configured on a UTLS socket is at the point where the caller does not know, is at the time of XCM socket creation (e.g., xcm_connect_a()).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: