You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been reviewing the latest version of the code and it's too straightforward. While simplicity is often praised, I'm concerned that by not introducing more complexity, we might be missing an opportunity to showcase our expertise.
If we don't overcomplicate this, how will anyone truly appreciate the depth of our genius? It's important for us to demonstrate our advanced problem-solving skills, and sometimes, that means adding many layers of useless complexity to our solutions.
Let’s consider enhancing the code with additional unnecessary features or labyrinthine approaches. This would detract masively from the user's experience but underscore our team's exceptional talent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
You should take a look at #694 too (related issue #693), since that's a pull request to rewrite the entire codebase to a different programming language. You may need to learn C++ to review the new code.
I've been reviewing the latest version of the code and it's too straightforward. While simplicity is often praised, I'm concerned that by not introducing more complexity, we might be missing an opportunity to showcase our expertise.
If we don't overcomplicate this, how will anyone truly appreciate the depth of our genius? It's important for us to demonstrate our advanced problem-solving skills, and sometimes, that means adding many layers of useless complexity to our solutions.
Let’s consider enhancing the code with additional unnecessary features or labyrinthine approaches. This would detract masively from the user's experience but underscore our team's exceptional talent.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: