-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
loss output: is this normal? #16
Comments
@askerlee @Eniac-Xie Could you please release your "ResNet101_BN_SCALE_Merged_OHEM" model files included test.prototxt,my download files not contain it,but i have no time to write it because of an emergency.Thank you very much!!! |
Just copy the test.prototxt from the ResNet101_BN_SCALE_Merged folder. They are the same (hard example mining only happens in training, so the test model is the same). |
change |
Hi, I have encountered the same problem. Have you solved it?I think it may be the problem of the code. When I used the OHEM code modified by myself to train the author's prototxt file, the loss was not 0, but it was difficult to converge (which did not exist on VGG16). |
Hi, I'm using ResNet101_BN_SCALE_Merged_OHEM on my own dataset. Some of the output losses (loss_bbox and loss_cls) are always 0.
Update: seems there are something wrong with OHEM. When I turn off OHEM everything is normal.
The output with OHEM turned off:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: