Skip to content

Dicom file with missing sop_instance_uid #252

Answered by Enet4
sh4hri4roo asked this question in Q&A
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

Sorry, I must have overlooked this discussion. This has been answered in #255:

The file is clearly missing mandatory fields as per PS3.10 Chapter 7, but it can be made more resilient with the following two changes:

  1. FileMetaTable expects mandatory fields to always be present, so it will have to be changed so that they also sit behind Options. Better coordinate this with #70 too.
  2. File opening options can be extended to support strict/relaxed checking (whether to error on missing attributes); and to fill in missing file meta attributes with default values or overrides.

Until something like the above is implemented, DICOM-rs requires all Type 1 file meta information attributes to be presen…

Replies: 1 comment

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by Enet4
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Category
Q&A
Labels
None yet
2 participants