You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, I want to thank you for your package, it has been very useful for my data analysis.
While I was using it (version 1.0), I found some unexpected behaviors when I wanted to transform a multilayer bipartite network into igraph object. In a few words, the get_igraph function seems to be having trouble in assigning the "type" of the node when there are nodes with no interactions in both layers while other nodes of the same type do have interactions in both layers. See the example below.
The final data frame should be showing, in the "type" column, all FALSE for As, and all TRUE for Ps. However, there is a FALSE in P5. There is a similar problem in the graph of the second layer (P1 is FALSE but it should be TRUE). Both P1 and P5 are nodes exclusively interacting in a single layer. As a consequence, plotting and further analysis using can be compromised.
If there is something I am missing, please, let me know.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Sincerely,
Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear emln package developers.
First of all, I want to thank you for your package, it has been very useful for my data analysis.
While I was using it (version 1.0), I found some unexpected behaviors when I wanted to transform a multilayer bipartite network into igraph object. In a few words, the
get_igraph
function seems to be having trouble in assigning the "type" of the node when there are nodes with no interactions in both layers while other nodes of the same type do have interactions in both layers. See the example below.The final data frame should be showing, in the "type" column, all FALSE for As, and all TRUE for Ps. However, there is a FALSE in P5. There is a similar problem in the graph of the second layer (P1 is FALSE but it should be TRUE). Both P1 and P5 are nodes exclusively interacting in a single layer. As a consequence, plotting and further analysis using can be compromised.
If there is something I am missing, please, let me know.
Thank you very much for your attention.
Sincerely,
Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: