Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Question] SWEET's subclasses for Landform are very mixed #235

Open
Garybc opened this issue Jan 16, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

[Question] SWEET's subclasses for Landform are very mixed #235

Garybc opened this issue Jan 16, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
bug esipwinter2021 Work which will feature at the ESIP Winter 2021 meeting

Comments

@Garybc
Copy link

Garybc commented Jan 16, 2021

Landscape and landcover are not usually thought of as subclasses of landform, but are classed as such in SWEET.
https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SWEET/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetontology.net%2FrealmLandOrographic%2FOrographic
Perhaps even more confusing is listing "orographic" and "non orographic:" as subclasses.

https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SWEET/?p=classes&conceptid=http%3A%2F%2Fsweetontology.net%2FrealmLandform%2FLandscape&jump_to_nav=true#visualization
@Garybc Garybc added the bug label Jan 16, 2021
@lewismc
Copy link
Member

lewismc commented Jan 20, 2021

@Garybc is this a duplication of #234 ?

@lewismc lewismc added the esipwinter2021 Work which will feature at the ESIP Winter 2021 meeting label Jan 20, 2021
@Garybc
Copy link
Author

Garybc commented Jan 20, 2021 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug esipwinter2021 Work which will feature at the ESIP Winter 2021 meeting
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@lewismc @Garybc