You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@SchroederSa brought up that we can still improve the documentation of our units:
Examples from the docs:
beam.sigmaPx (float, in momentum) rms Px
beam.sigmaPy (float, in momentum) rms Py
'in momentum' could be more precise
beam.sigmaT (float, in radian) rms normalized time difference T
How can the longitudinal position be in radians?
I assume
beam.sigmaPx (float, in momentum) rms Px ----> beam.sigmaPx (float, in radian) rms Px normalised to P_ref
beam.sigmaT (float, in radian) rms normalized time difference T ----> beam.sigmaT (float, in meter) rms time or similar
beam.sigmaPt (float, in energy deviation) rms Pt
I would consistently write the unit in parentheses and afterwards the description
meaning: beam.VARIABLE (type, in UNIT) what; how
beam.sigmaPx(float, in radian) rms of x-momentum; normalised to Pz of reference particle
Thanks for bringing this up, @SchroederSa, I'll put it on our agenda. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@SchroederSa brought up that we can still improve the documentation of our units:
Thanks for bringing this up, @SchroederSa, I'll put it on our agenda. :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: