Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug] Dot Purple installation fails on Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS #8

Open
alastairlundy opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 3 comments
Open

[Bug] Dot Purple installation fails on Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS #8

alastairlundy opened this issue Feb 9, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working linux

Comments

@alastairlundy
Copy link

Describe the bug
DotPurple fails to install on Pop!_OS 22.04 LTS.

Initially I didn't see the error details trying to install it via a GUI so I tried installing it using dpkg and that gave me the error details.

It looks like the latest DotPurple deb package expects an older version of libssl that is not installed on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS or newer based distributions.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Download latest DotPurple .deb file
  2. Open a terminal emulator application
  3. Enter the command sudo dkpg -i [PathToDotPurpleDebFile].deb
  4. See error

Expected behavior
DotPurple to install successfully.

Screenshots
Side Note: I renamed my copy of the Dot Purple deb package to make it easier to execute the dpkg command with it.

Image

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • OS: [e.g. iOS] Pop!_OS
  • Version [e.g. 1.0.1] 22.04 LTS with latest updates installed.
  • Linux Kernel version is 6.9.3

Additional context
libssl3 seems to be the libssl package that ships in Ubuntu 22.04 LTS based distros and newer.

Image

Hope this helps. Thanks :)

@alastairlundy alastairlundy added bug Something isn't working needs triage labels Feb 9, 2025
@Deadpikle
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the report. Looks like this is a common issue for .NET apps on Linux...hrm.

Can't take a look at this exact moment of this comment, but dotnet/core#4749 may have a workaround for you that could work. Looks like there are compat packages available for several distros that would allow things to run again.

@alastairlundy
Copy link
Author

Thanks for the report. Looks like this is a common issue for .NET apps on Linux...hrm.

Can't take a look at this exact moment of this comment, but dotnet/core#4749 may have a workaround for you that could work. Looks like there are compat packages available for several distros that would allow things to run again.

Hi,
Thanks for your suggestion. I'm a bit hesistant to install an older libssl version at the moment due to it not being up to date with fixes.

I'm going to try to reproduce the issue in a virtual machine running a fresh install of Ubuntu or Pop!_Os with the .NET SDK installed and try to investigate the issue further.

In the mean time can I keep this issue open?

Thanks

@alastairlundy
Copy link
Author

So, I did some experimenting and I was able to get DotPurple 1.12.2 working but I had to extract the deb file and run the DotPurple executable manually.

Image

@Deadpikle I think the issue is with the packaging of the .deb file and not with the application itself.

I did notice something unrelated that looks like a separate bug: Installing a workload through DotPurple would show as having been successfully installed but it wouldn't actually install the workload and refreshing the manage workloads page would show the workload as available to install.

Running dotnet workload list also didn't show the workload as having been installed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working linux
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants