Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Revidere arkitekturprinsippene i forhold til FKJ/Akson arbeidet #50

Open
thomiz opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Revidere arkitekturprinsippene i forhold til FKJ/Akson arbeidet #50

thomiz opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
@geirhan

Comments

@thomiz
Copy link
Member

thomiz commented Dec 9, 2022 •
edited
Loading

Kapitelet om arkitekturprinsipper bygger p.t. på Digdir sine prinsipper

Vurdere om andre prinsipper kan være relevante
@thomiz thomiz converted this from a draft issue Dec 9, 2022
@thomiz thomiz self-assigned this Dec 15, 2022
@thomiz
Copy link
Member Author

thomiz commented Dec 15, 2022

Henvise til prinsippene for datadeling i referansearkitektur for datadeling

@thomiz
Copy link
Member Author

thomiz commented Jan 16, 2023

@geirhan ser på denne (husk å assigne @thomiz )

@thomiz thomiz added this to the Sprint 07.02.2023 milestone Jan 16, 2023
@thomiz thomiz moved this from 📋 Backlog to 🏗 In progress in Målarkitektur DHO Jan 16, 2023
@thomiz thomiz assigned geirhan and unassigned thomiz Jan 16, 2023
@thomiz
Copy link
Member Author

thomiz commented Feb 27, 2023

Utsettes til neste release

@thomiz thomiz moved this from 🏗 In progress to 📋 Backlog in Målarkitektur DHO Feb 27, 2023
@thomiz thomiz removed this from the Sprint 07.02.2023 milestone Feb 27, 2023
@thomiz
Copy link
Member Author

thomiz commented Jun 5, 2023

Ikke noe akutt behov eventuelt ved neste revisjon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@geirhan geirhan

Labels
None yet
Projects
Målarkitektur DHO
Status: 📋 Backlog
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thomiz @geirhan