-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
calculate atom pairwise energies (combination between LJ and Coulomb) using OpenMM #501
Comments
Currently the definition of the interface is a bit of a mess (see #460), as we don't differentiate between the distance cutoff between graph nodes to create an edge and distance cutoff of residues to the interface to include in the graph. This will change in PR #492 that I am currently working on. Either way, it's a parameter that can be set by user and is passed to these functions: deeprank2/deeprank2/utils/graph.py Lines 322 to 415 in 7fdf6ab
The atom pairs are defined by this function: deeprank2/deeprank2/utils/buildgraph.py Lines 166 to 211 in 7fdf6ab
|
As @cbaakman pointed out, the current feature module that calculates the nonbond energies in the "old" method is this: https://github.com/DeepRank/deeprank2/blob/main/deeprank2/features/contact.py |
Hi, I see. Following the conversations on Slack, I am making the script to receive the PDB with the complex as input. Then, I calculate the interface residues by a heavy-atom distance cutoff of 5A (parameter that can be changed). Finally, it outputs a list with the atom's description, like the one below. However, I can make a function that also receives a list of residue pairs if you wish to input that instead of the complex. The same goes for the output; I can make it in any format. There are additional functionalities that I am obviating now for simplicity. Whatever the case, I will make it a standalone script that can be used as a command-line executable or a library from which you can import the functions you may need in other contexts.
|
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 30 days with no activity. |
This should be done in pdbprep, and its integration into deeprank2 will be handled in #509 |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: