Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

USGSCSM and HRSC #351

Closed
oleg-alexandrov opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 1 comment
Closed

USGSCSM and HRSC #351

oleg-alexandrov opened this issue Sep 14, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@oleg-alexandrov
Copy link
Collaborator

I tried to run the HRSC example from here: https://github.com/USGS-Astrogeology/usgscsm/wiki/CSM-Stereo-Testing-Examples

knoten fails by a large margin when comparing the CSM and ISIS models. I used the same logic as here: #349.

The outputs are:

isis2csm_data
diff line diff sample
count 1.000000e+02 100.000000
mean -2.501009e+06 24778.453399
std 2.887109e+02 288.674276
min -2.501459e+06 24328.454250
25% -2.501259e+06 24528.454152
50% -2.501009e+06 24778.453422
75% -2.500759e+06 25028.452711
max -2.500559e+06 25228.452356

csm2isis_data
diff line diff sample
count 100.000000 100.000000
mean -920.490000 -2137.490000
std 288.675135 288.675135
min -1370.490000 -2587.490000
25% -1170.490000 -2387.490000
50% -920.490000 -2137.490000
75% -670.490000 -1887.490000
max -470.490000 -1687.490000

The differences are so huge that stereo fails.

@oleg-alexandrov
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I think I figured out the cause, which I mention at DOI-USGS/ale#424. I will close this as redundant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant