Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify Spice-based ALE drivers against ISIS #562

Closed
Kelvinrr opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Verify Spice-based ALE drivers against ISIS #562

Kelvinrr opened this issue Sep 15, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation issue with broken links, typos, grammar, unclear descriptions, etc. found in the documentation enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@Kelvinrr
Copy link
Collaborator

We now have a lot of drivers available now, we need to figure out some way to rigorously validate these drivers against ISIS spice code. This will be necessary to be able to depreciate ISIS's existing code.

@Kelvinrr Kelvinrr added enhancement New feature or request documentation issue with broken links, typos, grammar, unclear descriptions, etc. found in the documentation labels Sep 15, 2023
@Kelvinrr Kelvinrr added this to the FY24-IAA-Modularization milestone Sep 15, 2023
@antonhibl antonhibl self-assigned this Nov 1, 2023
@antonhibl
Copy link
Contributor

working on this at https://github.com/antonhibl/ale/blob/spice-verification/ale/driver_verification.py, will make a PR when the script is more fleshed out but it definitely needs more work. I think it shows some of the ideas we want to accomplish though.

@antonhibl
Copy link
Contributor

This should be finished as of #584 being merged, which added a driver verification script to verify between ISIS and ALE spice outputs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation issue with broken links, typos, grammar, unclear descriptions, etc. found in the documentation enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants