Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider Simplifying/Refactoring ExtractedFeaturesType #415

Open
ikiril01 opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Consider Simplifying/Refactoring ExtractedFeaturesType #415

ikiril01 opened this issue Jan 13, 2016 · 0 comments

Comments

@ikiril01
Copy link
Member

We should consider simplifying/refactoring the ExtractedFeaturesType - the way it is currently implemented, it can be used to capture extracted imports (specific to executable binaries), functions (specific to executable code or binaries), strings (specific to binaries), and code snippets (specific to executable code or binaries). Accordingly, we could likely just add these fields to their corresponding Objects or have specific extensions for doing so, instead of having a single monolithic type that may not make sense in all contexts.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant