You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Firstly, congratulations on this excellent program, it is simply easy to use and the new Julia web interface just adds to that. I am very impressed.
Not so much a problem, as a clarification here:
I am modelling a sub-solidus metabasite using the Green et al (2016) solution models, and I have set the bulk H2O content to '0', setting it in excess. I want to clarify if setting the H2O to 0 is MAGEMin's equivalent of excess, or is there some other way I may have overlooked (I haven't used the Matlab interface)?
Setting H2O to 0 in the bulk generates some higher P fields (10 - 12 kbar) containing two feldspars (ksp & ksp) indicating an extremely dry rock, and in some cases saturating the bulk (in a T-XH2O section) gives some fields with 2 hb phases.
Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
Thanks for the support!
You are raising a very good point. This is something I was discussing with the TC team not so long ago because I wanted to a add reduced chemical system without water for the metabasite dataset.
But actually, the metabasite database has not been developed for dry cases (as far as I understand), therefore they told me it did not make sense to have a water content = 0.0.
The results you get by explicitly setting water to 0.0 are likely bogus. For the "dry(ish)" case I suggest you just prescribe a low water content such as 0.01 mol% of H2O.
If you need excess water just provide a large amount of water. Presently, I don't have a clean "excess" mode, but I will add that eventually. By clean, I mean that by setting a large value of H2O, H2O will always appear in the output with variable content, although it should only be stated that water is in excess.
There is a number of things that need to be better explained. I will expand the documentation as soon as possible.
Hello Nicolas,
Firstly, congratulations on this excellent program, it is simply easy to use and the new Julia web interface just adds to that. I am very impressed.
Not so much a problem, as a clarification here:
I am modelling a sub-solidus metabasite using the Green et al (2016) solution models, and I have set the bulk H2O content to '0', setting it in excess. I want to clarify if setting the H2O to 0 is MAGEMin's equivalent of excess, or is there some other way I may have overlooked (I haven't used the Matlab interface)?
Setting H2O to 0 in the bulk generates some higher P fields (10 - 12 kbar) containing two feldspars (ksp & ksp) indicating an extremely dry rock, and in some cases saturating the bulk (in a T-XH2O section) gives some fields with 2 hb phases.
Thanks again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: