Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update devdependency immutable to v5 #1948

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Nov 4, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
immutable (source) ^4.3.6 -> ^5.0.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

immutable-js/immutable-js (immutable)

v5.0.2

Compare Source

Changed
  • Fix wrong path for esm module after fix in 5.0.1

Full Changelog: immutable-js/immutable-js@v5.0.1...v5.0.2

v5.0.1

Compare Source

What's Changed

Fixes
Internal

Full Changelog: immutable-js/immutable-js@v5.0.0...v5.0.1

v5.0.0

Compare Source

Breaking changes

To sum up, the big change in 5.0 is a Typescript change related to Map that is typed closer to the JS object. This is a huge change for TS users, but do not impact the runtime behavior. (see Improve TypeScript definition for Map for more details)

Other breaking changes are:

[BREAKING] Remove deprecated methods:

Released in 5.0.0-rc.1

  • Map.of('k', 'v'): use Map([ [ 'k', 'v' ] ]) or Map({ k: 'v' })
  • Collection.isIterable: use isIterable directly
  • Collection.isKeyed: use isKeyed directly
  • Collection.isIndexed: use isIndexed directly
  • Collection.isAssociative: use isAssociative directly
  • Collection.isOrdered: use isOrdered directly
[BREAKING] OrdererMap and OrderedSet hashCode implementation has been fixed

Released in 5.0.0-rc.1

Fix issue implementation of hashCode for OrdererMap and OrderedSet where equal objects might not return the same hashCode.

Changed in #​2005

[BREAKING] Range function needs at least two defined parameters

Released in 5.0.0-beta.5

Range with undefined would end in an infinite loop. Now, you need to define at least the start and end values.

If you need an infinite range, you can use Range(0, Infinity).

Changed in #​1967 by @​jdeniau

[Minor BC break] Remove default export

Released in 5.0.0-beta.1

Immutable does not export a default object containing all it's API anymore.
As a drawback, you can not immport Immutable directly:

- import Immutable from 'immutable';
+ import { List, Map } from 'immutable';

- const l = Immutable.List([Immutable.Map({ a: 'A' })]);
+ const l = List([Map({ a: 'A' })]);

If you want the non-recommanded, but shorter migration path, you can do this:

- import Immutable from 'immutable';
+ import * as Immutable from 'immutable';

  const l = Immutable.List([Immutable.Map({ a: 'A' })]);
[TypeScript Break] Improve TypeScript definition for Map

Released in 5.0.0-beta.1

If you do use TypeScript, then this change does not impact you : no runtime change here.
But if you use Map with TypeScript, this is a HUGE change !
Imagine the following code

const m = Map({ length: 3, 1: 'one' });

This was previously typed as Map<string, string | number>

and return type of m.get('length') or m.get('inexistant') was typed as string | number | undefined.

This made Map really unusable with TypeScript.

Now the Map is typed like this:

MapOf<{
    length: number;
    1: string;
}>

and the return type of m.get('length') is typed as number.

The return of m.get('inexistant') throw the TypeScript error:

Argument of type '"inexistant"' is not assignable to parameter of type '1 | "length"

If you want to keep the old definition

This is a minor BC for TS users, so if you want to keep the old definition, you can declare you Map like this:

const m = Map<string, string | number>({ length: 3, 1: 'one' });
If you need to type the Map with a larger definition

You might want to declare a wider definition, you can type your Map like this:

type MyMapType = {
  length: number;
  1: string | null;
  optionalProperty?: string;
};
const m = Map<MyMapType>({ length: 3, 1: 'one' });

Keep in mind that the MapOf will try to be consistant with the simple TypeScript object, so you can not do this:

Map({ a: 'a' }).set('b', 'b');
Map({ a: 'a' }).delete('a');

Like a simple object, it will only work if the type is forced:

Map<{ a: string; b?: string }>({ a: 'a' }).set('b', 'b'); // b is forced in type and optional
Map<{ a?: string }>({ a: 'a' }).delete('a'); // you can only delete an optional key
Are all Map methods implemented ?

For now, only get, getIn, set, update, delete, remove, toJS, toJSON methods are implemented. All other methods will fallback to the basic Map definition. Other method definition will be added later, but as some might be really complex, we prefer the progressive enhancement on the most used functions.

Fixes
Internal

v4.3.7

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Nov 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.48%. Comparing base (17d5f20) to head (c470df5).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1948   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.48%   99.48%           
=======================================
  Files          86       86           
  Lines        3123     3123           
  Branches      526      526           
=======================================
  Hits         3107     3107           
  Misses         14       14           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant