| Criteria | Points Available | Description | Learning Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Project Plan and User Stories | 10 | Evaluate the originality, specificity, and detail of the project plan and user stories. | LO1: Define clear and detailed user stories. |
| Design Documentation | 10 | Evaluate the originality of the designs, customization, and accessibility considerations. | LO2: Create detailed and accessible design documentation. |
| Version Control Setup | 10 | Evaluate the consistency of commits, clarity of messages, and documentation of any branching strategies. | LO3: Proficiency in using version control systems. |
| AI Tool Usage | 10 | Evaluate the clarity of the AI tool usage plan and how effectively AI tools were integrated. | LO4: Effective use of AI tools in the project. |
| Code Quality and Standards | 15 | Evaluate adherence to HTML5/CSS3 standards, readability, maintainability, and optimization of AI-generated code. | LO5: Write clean, readable, and maintainable code. |
| AI-Generated Code Integration | 15 | Evaluate documentation and critical assessment of AI-generated code integration. | LO6: Integrate and optimize AI-generated code. |
| Functional Implementation | 20 | Evaluate whether the implementation meets all user stories' acceptance criteria and the originality of the solution. | LO7: Implement functional features that meet user stories. |
| User Experience Quality | 10 | Evaluate the overall quality of the user experience, including design aesthetics, usability, and responsiveness. | LO8: Create an intuitive and appealing user experience. |
| Final Project Submission | 5 | Evaluate the completeness of the submission, including functionality, documentation, and proper attribution. | LO9: Deliver a complete and well-documented project. |
| Retrospective Report | 5 | Evaluate the honesty, detail, and quality of reflections in the retrospective report. | LO10: Reflect on the development process and learn from it. |
| Presentation | 10 | Evaluate the clarity, coherence, and effectiveness of the final project presentation. | LO11: Effectively present and communicate the project. |
- 0-4 points: Lacks structure, user stories are missing or generic.
- 5-6 points: Basic user stories with some acceptance criteria, but lacking detail.
- 7-8 points: Detailed user stories with clear priorities and acceptance criteria.
- 9-10 points: Comprehensive and exceptionally detailed user stories with thorough acceptance criteria.
- 0-4 points: Missing or incomplete wireframes and UX design documentation.
- 5-6 points: Basic wireframes and UX design documentation with some accessibility considerations.
- 7-8 points: Detailed wireframes and comprehensive UX design documentation, including accessibility considerations.
- 9-10 points: Exceptional wireframes and UX design documentation with thorough and detailed accessibility considerations.
- 0-4 points: Minimal commits, lack of clear version control practices.
- 5-6 points: Basic setup with some commits and minimal documentation.
- 7-8 points: Well-organized with regular commits and clear documentation.
- 9-10 points: Exceptionally organized with frequent, detailed commits and advanced documentation of practices.
- 0-4 points: Missing or unclear plan for using AI tools.
- 5-6 points: Basic description of AI tool usage with some integration.
- 7-8 points: Detailed plan with effective AI tool usage.
- 9-10 points: Comprehensive and strategic plan with highly effective AI tool integration.
- 0-6 points: Poor code quality, inconsistent standards.
- 7-9 points: Basic code quality with some adherence to standards.
- 10-12 points: High code quality with good adherence to standards.
- 13-15 points: Exceptional code quality with perfect adherence to standards.
- 0-6 points: Poor or ineffective use of AI tools, minimal integration.
- 7-9 points: Basic integration with some critical assessment.
- 10-12 points: Effective use with good integration and assessment.
- 13-15 points: Exceptional use with seamless integration and thorough assessment.
- 0-8 points: Incomplete or non-functional implementation.
- 9-12 points: Basic functional implementation with some issues.
- 13-16 points: High-quality functional implementation with minor issues.
- 17-20 points: Outstanding functional implementation meeting all criteria flawlessly.
- 0-4 points: Poor user experience with significant usability issues and unappealing design.
- 5-6 points: Basic user experience with some usability and design issues.
- 7-8 points: Good user experience with minor usability and design issues.
- 9-10 points: Exceptional user experience with intuitive usability, appealing design, and responsiveness.
- 0-2 points: Incomplete submission, missing components.
- 3 points: Complete submission with functional application and basic documentation.
- 4 points: High-quality submission with well-documented application.
- 5 points: Exceptional submission with thorough documentation and full functionality.
- 0-2 points: Missing or superficial report.
- 3 points: Basic reflection with some insights.
- 4 points: Detailed reflection with clear insights and learnings.
- 5 points: Comprehensive and insightful reflection with thorough analysis and proposed improvements.
- 0-4 points: Poor presentation with lack of clarity and coherence.
- 5-6 points: Basic presentation with some clarity and coherence.
- 7-8 points: Good presentation with clear, coherent delivery.
- 9-10 points: Outstanding presentation with excellent clarity, coherence, and effectiveness.
This matrix ensures that all critical aspects of the project are evaluated thoroughly and fairly, providing a comprehensive assessment of each team's work.