Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Quickwit support #95

Open
zamazan4ik opened this issue Apr 2, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Add Quickwit support #95

zamazan4ik opened this issue Apr 2, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@zamazan4ik
Copy link

zamazan4ik commented Apr 2, 2023

Would be nice to see Quickwit comparison as well since at least ElasticSearch is supported here right now.

Pinging @fulmicoton - probably you could be interested in it at least from the perspective "where Quickwit performance could be improved compared to other engines".

@fulmicoton
Copy link

@zamazan4ik Oh that would be awesome. Unfortunately Quickwit does not handle SQL at the moment.
I eyeballed the SQL queries... Maybe we can perform the same computation in Quickwit 0.5 with the JSON DSL.
Would that be ok or do we need to support SQL?

@zamazan4ik
Copy link
Author

Maybe we can perform the same computation in Quickwit 0.5 with the JSON DSL.
Would that be ok or do we need to support SQL?

I think it would be ok, since here authors mention the possibility to improve performance via rewriting queries into the native DSL.

@fulmicoton
Copy link

I had a look at the bench. Maybe we cannot perform all of the queries yet, but it seems like the benchmark is pretty flexible and will run the queries we can run.

The set of queries is not really friendly to search engines, but it should still be very instructive for us.

@alexey-milovidov
Copy link
Member

It's ok to add a DBMS without SQL support.
For example, see MongoDB: https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/blob/main/mongodb/queries.js

@alexey-milovidov
Copy link
Member

Looking forward to seeing Quickwit added!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants