Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

-Wframe-larger-than= in drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c #100

Closed
tpimh opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 3 comments
Closed

-Wframe-larger-than= in drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c #100

tpimh opened this issue Sep 17, 2018 · 3 comments
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists

Comments

@tpimh
Copy link

tpimh commented Sep 17, 2018

Close if can be merged with #39

drivers/acpi/processor_thermal.c:236:1: warning: stack frame size of 2296 bytes in function 'processor_set_cur_state' [-Wframe-larger-than=]
processor_set_cur_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,
^
1 warning generated.
@tpimh tpimh added [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. low priority This bug is not critical and not a priority labels Sep 17, 2018
@nickdesaulniers
Copy link
Member

please verify if this are still seen without CONFIG_KASAN

@tpimh
Copy link
Author

tpimh commented Sep 18, 2018

Without CONFIG_KASAN all instances of -Wframe-larger-than= are gone

@tpimh
Copy link
Author

tpimh commented Sep 18, 2018

I will not create any issues about this warning anymore, they are all very similar.

@nickdesaulniers nickdesaulniers added duplicate This issue or pull request already exists and removed [BUG] linux A bug that should be fixed in the mainline kernel. low priority This bug is not critical and not a priority labels Sep 19, 2018
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 15, 2019
If we drop the engine lock, we may run execlists_dequeue which may free
the priolist. Therefore if we ever drop the execution lock on the
engine, we have to discard our cache and refetch the priolist to ensure
we do not use a stale pointer.

[  506.418935] [IGT] gem_exec_whisper: starting subtest contexts-priority
[  593.240825] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP
[  593.240863] CPU: 1 PID: 494 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G     U            5.0.0-rc6+ #100
[  593.240879] Hardware name:  /NUC6CAYB, BIOS AYAPLCEL.86A.0029.2016.1124.1625 11/24/2016
[  593.240965] RIP: 0010:__i915_schedule+0x1fe/0x320 [i915]
[  593.240981] Code: 48 8b 0c 24 48 89 c3 49 8b 45 28 49 8b 75 20 4c 89 3c 24 48 89 46 08 48 89 30 48 8b 43 08 48 89 4b 08 49 89 5d 20 49 89 45 28 <48> 89 08 45 39 a7 b8 03 00 00 7d 44 45 89 a7 b8 03 00 00 49 8b 85
[  593.240999] RSP: 0018:ffffc90000057a60 EFLAGS: 00010046
[  593.241013] RAX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RBX: ffff8882582d7870 RCX: ffff88826baba6f0
[  593.241026] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffff8882582d6e70 RDI: ffff888273482194
[  593.241049] RBP: ffffc90000057a68 R08: ffff8882582d7680 R09: ffff8882582d7840
[  593.241068] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea00095ebe08 R12: 0000000000000728
[  593.241105] R13: ffff88826baba6d0 R14: ffffc90000057a40 R15: ffff888273482158
[  593.241120] FS:  00007f4613fb3900(0000) GS:ffff888277a80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  593.241133] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  593.241146] CR2: 00007f57d3c66a84 CR3: 000000026e2b6000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[  593.241158] Call Trace:
[  593.241233]  i915_schedule+0x1f/0x30 [i915]
[  593.241326]  i915_request_add+0x1a9/0x290 [i915]
[  593.241393]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45f/0x1150 [i915]
[  593.241411]  ? init_object+0x49/0x80
[  593.241425]  ? ___slab_alloc.constprop.91+0x4b8/0x4e0
[  593.241491]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x99/0x380 [i915]
[  593.241563]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[  593.241629]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x1bb/0x380 [i915]
[  593.241705]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[  593.241724]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0x81/0xd0
[  593.241738]  drm_ioctl+0x1a7/0x310
[  593.241803]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer_ioctl+0x270/0x270 [i915]
[  593.241819]  ? __update_load_avg_se+0x1c9/0x240
[  593.241834]  ? pick_next_entity+0x7e/0x120
[  593.241851]  do_vfs_ioctl+0x88/0x5d0
[  593.241880]  ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x70
[  593.241894]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
[  593.241907]  do_syscall_64+0x44/0xf0
[  593.241924]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
[  593.241940] RIP: 0033:0x7f4615ffe757
[  593.241952] Code: 00 00 90 48 8b 05 39 a7 0c 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 09 a7 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[  593.241970] RSP: 002b:00007ffc1030ddf8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[  593.241984] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffc10324420 RCX: 00007f4615ffe757
[  593.241997] RDX: 00007ffc1030e220 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  593.242010] RBP: 00007ffc1030e220 R08: 00007f46160c9208 R09: 00007f46160c9240
[  593.242022] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000040406469
[  593.242038] R13: 0000000000000003 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
[  593.242058] Modules linked in: i915 intel_gtt drm_kms_helper prime_numbers

v2: Track the local engine cache and explicitly clear it when switching
engine locks.

Fixes: a02eb97 ("drm/i915/execlists: Cache the priolist when rescheduling")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_whisper/contexts-priority # rare!
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <[email protected]>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <[email protected]>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/[email protected]
(cherry picked from commit ed7dc67)
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 20, 2019
Update the build scripts and the version magic to reflect when
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT is enabled in the same way as CONFIG_PREEMPT is treated.

The resulting version strings:

  Linux m 5.3.0-rc1+ #100 SMP Fri Jul 26 ...
  Linux m 5.3.0-rc1+ #101 SMP PREEMPT Fri Jul 26 ...
  Linux m 5.3.0-rc1+ #102 SMP PREEMPT_RT Fri Jul 26 ...

The module vermagic:

  5.3.0-rc1+ SMP mod_unload modversions
  5.3.0-rc1+ SMP preempt mod_unload modversions
  5.3.0-rc1+ SMP preempt_rt mod_unload modversions

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <[email protected]>
nathanchance pushed a commit that referenced this issue Sep 23, 2019
…vices fails

Before this commit dj_probe would exit with an error if the initial
logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices fails. The initial call may fail
when the receiver is connected through a kvm and the focus is away.

When the call fails this causes 2 problems:

1) dj_probe calls logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices after calling
hid_device_io_start() so a HID report may have been received in between
and our delayedwork_callback may be running. It seems that the initial
logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices failure happening with some KVMs triggers
this exact scenario, causing the work-queue to run on free-ed memory,
leading to:

 BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: 0000000000001e88
 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
 #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
 PGD 0 P4D 0
 Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
 CPU: 3 PID: 257 Comm: kworker/3:3 Tainted: G           OE     5.3.0-rc5+ #100
 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./B150M Pro4S/D3, BIOS P7.10 12/06/2016
 Workqueue: events 0xffffffffc02ba200
 RIP: 0010:0xffffffffc02ba1bd
 Code: e8 e8 13 00 d8 48 89 c5 48 85 c0 74 4c 48 8b 7b 10 48 89 ea b9 07 00 00 00 41 b9 09 00 00 00 41 b8 01 00 00 00 be 10 00 00 00 <48> 8b 87 88 1e 00 00 48 8b 40 40 e8 b3 6b b4 d8 48 89 ef 41 89 c4
 RSP: 0018:ffffb760c046bdb8 EFLAGS: 00010286
 RAX: ffff935038ea4550 RBX: ffff935046778000 RCX: 0000000000000007
 RDX: ffff935038ea4550 RSI: 0000000000000010 RDI: 0000000000000000
 RBP: ffff935038ea4550 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000009
 R10: 000000000000e011 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9350467780e8
 R13: ffff935046778000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff935046778070
 FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff935054e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
 CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
 CR2: 0000000000001e88 CR3: 000000075a612002 CR4: 00000000003606e0
 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
 Call Trace:
  0xffffffffc02ba2f7
  ? process_one_work+0x1b1/0x560
  process_one_work+0x234/0x560
  worker_thread+0x50/0x3b0
  kthread+0x10a/0x140
  ? process_one_work+0x560/0x560
  ? kthread_park+0x80/0x80
  ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
 Modules linked in: vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep vfat fat btusb btrtl btbcm btintel bluetooth intel_rapl_msr ecdh_generic rfkill ecc snd_usb_audio snd_usbmidi_lib intel_rapl_common snd_rawmidi mc x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support mei_wdt mei_hdcp ppdev kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_generic crc32_pclmul snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek snd_hda_codec_generic ledtrig_audio ghash_clmulni_intel intel_cstate snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec intel_uncore snd_hda_core snd_hwdep intel_rapl_perf snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm snd_timer intel_wmi_thunderbolt snd e1000e soundcore mxm_wmi i2c_i801 bfq mei_me mei intel_pch_thermal parport_pc parport acpi_pad binfmt_misc hid_lg_g15(E) hid_logitech_dj(E) i915 crc32c_intel i2c_algo_bit drm_kms_helper nvme nvme_core drm wmi video uas usb_storage i2c_dev
 CR2: 0000000000001e88
 ---[ end trace 1d3f8afdcfcbd842 ]---

2) Even if we were to fix 1. by making sure the work is stopped before
failing probe, failing probe is the wrong thing to do, we have
logi_dj_recv_queue_unknown_work to deal with the initial
logi_dj_recv_query_paired_devices failure.

Rather then error-ing out of the probe, causing the receiver to not work at
all we should rely on this, so that the attached devices will get properly
enumerated once the KVM focus is switched back.

Cc: [email protected]
Fixes: 74808f9 ("HID: logitech-dj: add support for non unifying receivers")
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
duplicate This issue or pull request already exists
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants