-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 82
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Failing CRAN checks - due 10/16 #183
Comments
RSocrata was pulled off CRAN, this time they didn't give much warning, just one email on 10/2. The only failing test I see is documented as relating to issue #118, line 131 of the test script. The data set is returning 146 columns instead of 150. Edit: I linked to the test, the actual failing part is this part |
Also, the link to the CRAN checks is no longer available, so I can't confirm that the errors I'm seeing are the same that they were seeing |
Changing the expected number of columns to 146 fixes the issue and all tests pass. Socrata changed the number of columns in this dataset. Since the test itself is unrelated to the number of columns, I think the fact that the test now passes means that the breakage is resolved and we should resubmit to CRAN. I'll start another issue to investigate the column number change as well as other inconsistencies reported by @geneorama in #118. |
We are now passing CRAN checks and have submitted the package to be back on CRAN. |
https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_RSocrata.html
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: