Bladebit 3.1 very slow GPU plot

[Wredziach007]

Hi, im trying to solve issue with 1h GPU plot. I got 256 Ram and p104-100 8gb and my times are 50+

i had same figures with 128 of ram. there is no difference between hybrid or full ram

im plotting in windows 11 pro

Bladebit Chia Plotter
Version : 3.1.0
Git Commit : e9836f8
Compiled With: msvc 19.29.30152

[Global Plotting Config]
Will create 1 plots.
Thread count : 24
Warm start enabled : false
NUMA disabled : false
CPU affinity disabled : false
Farmer public key : XXX
Compression Level : 7
Benchmark mode : disabled

[Bladebit CUDA Plotter]
Host RAM : 255 GiB
Plot checks : disabled

Selected cuda device 0 : NVIDIA P104-100
CUDA Compute Capability : 6.1
SM count : 15
Max blocks per SM : 32
Max threads per SM : 2048
Async Engine Count : 2
L2 cache size : 2.00 MB
L2 persist cache max size : 0.00 MB
Stack Size : 1.00 KB
Memory:
Total : 7.92 GB
Free : 7.33 GB

Allocating buffers (this may take a few seconds)...
Kernel RAM required : 91955994624 bytes ( 87696.07 MiB or 85.64 GiB )
Intermediate RAM required : 4378927104 bytes ( 4176.07 MiB or 4.08 GiB )
Host RAM required : 142270791680 bytes ( 135680.00 MiB or 132.50 GiB )
Total Host RAM required : 234226786304 bytes ( 223376.07 MiB or 218.14 GiB )
GPU RAM required : 6163050496 bytes ( 5877.54 MiB or 5.74 GiB )
Allocating buffers...
Done.

Generating plot 1 / 1: aa47a08213479307bae041866589e5961f9ab7f0ed3ae9b085a6cc02e9770b8b
Plot temporary file: G:\PLOTS/plot-k32-c07-2024-01-30-13-41-aa47a08213479307bae041866589e5961f9ab7f0ed3ae9b085a6cc02e9770b8b.plot.tmp

Generating F1
Progress update: 0.01
Finished F1 in 49.71 seconds.
Progress update: 0.1
Table 2 completed in 140.38 seconds with 4294962173 entries.
Progress update: 0.2
Table 3 completed in 243.40 seconds with 4294868194 entries.
Progress update: 0.3
Table 4 completed in 307.13 seconds with 4294757024 entries.
Progress update: 0.4
Table 5 completed in 287.02 seconds with 4294626541 entries.
Progress update: 0.5
Table 6 completed in 249.21 seconds with 4294227507 entries.
Progress update: 0.6
Table 7 completed in 194.87 seconds with 4293350025 entries.
Progress update: 0.7
Finalizing Table 7
Finalized Table 7 in 92.96 seconds.
Completed Phase 1 in 1567.67 seconds
Progress update: 0.8
Marked Table 6 in 35.87 seconds.
Marked Table 5 in 38.02 seconds.
Marked Table 4 in 38.02 seconds.
Marked Table 3 in 38.02 seconds.
Completed Phase 2 in 149.94 seconds
Progress update: 0.9
Compressing Table 2 and 3...
Step 1 completed step in 109.53 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 106.34 seconds.
Completed table 2 in 215.87 seconds with 3439752012 / 4294868194 entries ( 80.09% ).
Compressing tables 3 and 4...
Step 1 completed step in 98.80 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 154.70 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 121.32 seconds.
Completed table 3 in 374.83 seconds with 3465839452 / 4294757024 entries ( 80.70% ).
Compressing tables 4 and 5...
Step 1 completed step in 99.03 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 155.83 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 122.57 seconds.
Completed table 4 in 377.43 seconds with 3532535739 / 4294626541 entries ( 82.25% ).
Compressing tables 5 and 6...
Step 1 completed step in 98.90 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 159.57 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 126.70 seconds.
Completed table 5 in 385.17 seconds with 3712820463 / 4294227507 entries ( 86.46% ).
Compressing tables 6 and 7...
Step 1 completed step in 97.95 seconds.
Step 2 completed step in 172.24 seconds.
Step 3 completed step in 142.76 seconds.
Completed table 6 in 412.96 seconds with 4293350025 / 4293350025 entries ( 100.00% ).
Serializing P7 entries
Completed serializing P7 entries in 69.55 seconds.
Completed Phase 3 in 1835.81 seconds
Progress update: 0.95
Completed Plot 1 in 3553.42 seconds ( 59.22 minutes )

Thanks for help