You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence is likely to have some important consequences for a graph data model based on lambda calculus. Specifically, an interpretation of types as propositions is likely to suggest a natural framework for knowledge representation and reasoning using λG and Hydra. This might require introducing dependent types. It would be worthwhile to try building up such a framework from first principles, then align it with more conventional frameworks like OWL, and also apply it to property graphs and TinkerPop.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence is likely to have some important consequences for a graph data model based on lambda calculus. Specifically, an interpretation of types as propositions is likely to suggest a natural framework for knowledge representation and reasoning using λG and Hydra. This might require introducing dependent types. It would be worthwhile to try building up such a framework from first principles, then align it with more conventional frameworks like OWL, and also apply it to property graphs and TinkerPop.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: