Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

property details #19

Open
mkobetic opened this issue Apr 15, 2013 · 1 comment
Open

property details #19

mkobetic opened this issue Apr 15, 2013 · 1 comment

Comments

@mkobetic
Copy link
Member

Jan and I had a discussion and he pointed out that the spec doesn't prescribe any ordering of properties in a ston file even though we both assumed alphabetically sorted. The sorting is important to avoid spurious changes due to random ordering. Can we add that requirement to the spec?

Also we discussed the topic of omitting empty properties. Currently STIG leaves them out, wheres STX does not. We may want tighten the spec in this regard as well. Can we say that empty properties SHOULD be omitted?

@dalehenrich
Copy link
Member

Alphabetic ordering is important, so yes it should be added to spec.

I'm inclined to want to keep empty files around (I don't fee strongly here)...

To me the directory structure is reflecting an object structure and each file represents and instance variable in the object, so an empty file represents the existence of the slot ... without the empty slot we might be looking at a different object structure ...

BTW, where do the empty properties files show up?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants