-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Gamma-ray Flux with EGMF #489
Comments
Hey @RodrigoSasse, I tried to reproduce your results using the release 3.2.1. The Impact of the magnetic field can not be seen in your simulation as you are using a 1D observer. This is the full For the propagation DINT is not used anymore. All parts of the cascades can be done with the corresponding EM-module (like in your simulation setup). It doesn't matter where the photons are originated from. |
Hello @JulienDoerner, I'm using version 3.2.1 and I've also done some tests on version 3.1.7, in both cases I've only obtained photons with energy above 10 GeV. The 3D observer structure seems to be working now, thanks, but still the gamma flux is not similar to the one in the paper, the flux increases in the energy range of 1 -10 TeV when I use the EGMF module. |
I cannot reproduce the lower energy problem with 3.2.1. |
I reinstall the CRPropa3, to do that I downloaded the latest release in the installation page, this is my log installation in the terminal: rodrigo@rodrigo-Dell:~/CRPropa3/build$ cmake .. -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=$/home/rodrigo/CRPropa3/build
Some of these libraries may not be found correctly. -- Generating done After finish the installation (make & make install) I tried again to reproduce the results of the paper and even so the photons remain at a minimum energy of 10 GeV. |
Hello,
I'm trying to reproduce some of the results presented in the article on the latest version of CRPropa3 (10.1088/1475-7516/2022/09/035), in particular I'm interested in better understanding the Electromagnetic cascades and thinning module. I'd like to know how best to reproduce the figure 6 shown in the article.
So far I've been trying to combine the 4D simulation with EGMF modules and the Electromagnetic cascades example in a single script, but I'm getting very different results.
my questions are how to generate gamma rays with an energy lower than 10 GeV? Even if I set a minimum energy of 1 GeV, the flux generated is still starts at 10 GeV. Furthermore, in these tests it seems to me that the gamma flux is not suppressed by the stronger magnetic fields or the EGMF has no effect. I've attached an example of the script I'm using to test it example.txt
Another question is what would be the best strategy for saving and propagating the secondary photons generated by the propagation of nuclei to the observer in the 4D scenario? Do the Electromagnetic Cascades modules already do this or is it still necessary to use the DINT code?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: