Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Forcefield wall Thickness #58

Open
nuclear200 opened this issue Dec 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Forcefield wall Thickness #58

nuclear200 opened this issue Dec 24, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@nuclear200
Copy link

I was trying to give some thickness to the field, and since there are no modules to do so (which could be a nice addition) i ended up using the field fusion module to fuse an inverse sphere field with an inner "bubble/standard" field.
The results were promising but also... "wobbly".
Since it would not be easy to explain, i'll attach a video with setup, config and issue (25 sec.) https://youtu.be/OsGVDhycYoM
The [Enhancement req] would be a thickness module

@DarkGuardsman DarkGuardsman changed the title [strange behevoir/ Enhancement request] forcefield thickness Forcefield wall Thickness Jan 22, 2025
@DarkGuardsman
Copy link
Member

@Su5eD we likely want to rework the UI and modules in general. I recommend dropping the existing way slots work. Moving to using the modules to increase block count. Then using sliders to change the properties of the field. We can make a widget per field type to better handle this as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants