Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Require current building modeled scenario for L2 audits #68

Open
corymosiman12 opened this issue Mar 25, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Require current building modeled scenario for L2 audits #68

corymosiman12 opened this issue Mar 25, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@corymosiman12
Copy link
Contributor

So, in going through my example tonight, I discovered that our use cases for L1 and L2 audits don't require a current building modeled scenario, they actually require pointing back to the current building measured scenario. My thoughts on this:

  1. For an L1 audit, we don't require detailed consumption / savings information to be provided within the scenario, we only need to suffice the requirements of the SimpleImpactAnalysis element (high/med/low estimates). Therefore, for L1, I think it is OK that we only require a current building measured scenario, and require that all POM scenarios point back to it (i.e. ReferenceCase) (which is what our current schematron achieves).
  2. For an L2 audit, however, since we are looking for detailed consumption / savings information, I think we should require a current building modeled scenario (in addition to the measured), BUT all POM scenarios should point to the modeled scenario via ReferenceCase
@corymosiman12 corymosiman12 changed the title L1 and L2 Audits Don't Require Current Building Modeled Scenario L2 Audits Don't Require Current Building Modeled Scenario Mar 25, 2021
@corymosiman12 corymosiman12 changed the title L2 Audits Don't Require Current Building Modeled Scenario Require current building modeled scenario for L2 audits Mar 25, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant