Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Access to ScriptPubKeys of inputs. #3

Open
roconnor-blockstream opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Open

Access to ScriptPubKeys of inputs. #3

roconnor-blockstream opened this issue Apr 4, 2019 · 0 comments
Labels
bitcoin-specific Issue applies only to the Bitcoin application of Simplicity (and not Elements).

Comments

@roconnor-blockstream
Copy link
Collaborator

It is suggested in https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2018-November/016508.html that signatures cover the input's scriptPubKey:

 * The hash of the scriptPubKey (or nothing if MASK)

Simplicity's Bitcoin primitives should be expanded to make this easy as well.
@gmaxwell gmaxwell mentioned this issue Nov 11, 2019
Closed
@roconnor-blockstream roconnor-blockstream added the bitcoin-specific Issue applies only to the Bitcoin application of Simplicity (and not Elements). label Feb 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bitcoin-specific Issue applies only to the Bitcoin application of Simplicity (and not Elements).
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@roconnor-blockstream