Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
31 lines (21 loc) · 2.8 KB

Unrestricted-Task-Execution.md

File metadata and controls

31 lines (21 loc) · 2.8 KB

Unrestricted-Task-Execution

Description

The problem of Unrestricted Task Execution in Large Language Model (LLM) systems arises when external entities can manipulate the model's task encoding capabilities to perform arbitrary tasks, far beyond its original design and purpose.

Extended Description

LLMs, intentionally programmed for specific tasks, may fall prey to manipulation when task specificity constraints are reprogrammed, nonexistent, or if input controls are bypassed. Under such situations, an unexpected scope arises, enabling an attacker to exploit the LLM well beyond its defined purpose. The potential ramifications extend from generation of unforeseen or even harmful responses leading to reputational damage, up to escalating computational demands. If the scope and intricacy of tasks are not in line with resource allocation, it puts a strain on computational resources and could lead to unexpected cost overruns.

Potential Mitigations

  • Task Specificity: Solidify task specificity by enforcing stringent constraints regarding the scope of tasks the LLM can execute.
  • Input Control: Implement robust control over user inputs to prevent manipulation and control of the model's intended function.
  • Output Validation: Introduce an additional layer of validation to assess the relevance and appropriateness of the responses against the model's intended purpose.
  • Monitoring and Alert Systems: Implement comprehensive monitoring and alert mechanisms to identify and respond to unintended task execution.
  • User Role Management: Assign roles and manage users to limit the level of interaction based on the level of trust and authority of each user.

Related Weaknesses

  • CWE-285: Improper Authorization: The LLM inadvertently allows unauthorized users to manipulate task prompts, leading to execution paths that diverge from its intended purpose.
  • CWE-284: Improper Access Control: The issue manifests due to a lack of stringent access controls that can limit the LLM's behavior.
  • CWE-250: Execution with Unnecessary Privileges: It is crucial to limit the LLM's abilities and prevent exercise of unnecessary privileges.

Impact Analysis

  • Reputation Damage: Unpredictability and potential misuse of the LLM could lead to reputation damage.
  • System Resources Usage: The LLM may consume additional system resources while performing unintended tasks causing performance impacts and/or cost overruns.
  • Functionality Misuse: The LLM may be used to perform actions that it was not originally intended to undertake resulting in misuse.
  • Increased Attack Surface: The broader the task-performing abilities of the LLM, the larger the attack surface.
  • Loss of Functional Control: Deviating from its intended utility, the LLM may become an uncontrolled tool if not managed properly.