Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

filter layout / function / etc #158

Open
filefolder opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

filter layout / function / etc #158

filefolder opened this issue Nov 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees

Comments

@filefolder
Copy link
Collaborator

a few scattered comments

  1. it would be good to homogenize the aesthetic / appearance of the filter bars on the left between say, continuous and event downloads.

    1.5) continuous data needs to have waveform filters at the final step as well, even if it's sort of redundant. people may not have meant to want to download everything in their original station search, or might change their mind, or only want to do one channel at a time, etc

  2. waveform filters should always have all four: Network, Station, Location, Channel, same as the station filters

  3. in general i think it is more robust to keep the filters as text boxes (rather than pull-down selections) with the defaults pre-populated (e.g *, or ?H?,?N?), at least for the "smaller" fields like location and channel. i think this makes these more useful tools and teaches users how it all works. it gets a bit more messy to also have network and station as text boxes because they can potentially get pretty long and these selections are fundamentally done in the station map selection page anyway.

@filefolder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

  1. need to be consistent with displaying "console-style" progress output, particularly when downloading waveforms (both event and continuous) so users can see what's happening (or not). I like the way it is done in run_continuous (e.g. render in ui/components/waveform.py )

@laughing0li laughing0li self-assigned this Dec 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants