Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review RDF standard and lomapSpec #86

Open
alvaroglezeri opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Review RDF standard and lomapSpec #86

alvaroglezeri opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
‼️Help wanted Extra attention is needed 🔧Implementation Implementing the solution 🔎Research Research about architecture or analyze options ⚡New New feature or request

Comments

@alvaroglezeri
Copy link
Contributor

alvaroglezeri commented Mar 17, 2023

We should review the RDF standard and all discussions under lomapSpec.
I believe we should adapt our entities to those in the standard: for example, remove Picture and replace it by Place::image or I think it benefits us to adapt to what is decided in the discussion, it would give the app more value. Tell me what you think :)

@alvaroglezeri alvaroglezeri added ‼️Help wanted Extra attention is needed ⚡New New feature or request 🔧Implementation Implementing the solution 🔎Research Research about architecture or analyze options labels Mar 17, 2023
@alvaroglezeri alvaroglezeri changed the title Revisar estándar RDF y lomapSpec Review RDF standard and lomapSpec Apr 9, 2023
@alvaroglezeri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Cancelled due to time constraints.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
‼️Help wanted Extra attention is needed 🔧Implementation Implementing the solution 🔎Research Research about architecture or analyze options ⚡New New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants