diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 2e64de3..863d742 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ fn main() {
 
 which can produce an output similar to this one:
 
-![Typical SIR output](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/master/sir.png)
+![Typical SIR output](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/main/sir.png?raw=true)
 
 ## Python bindings
 
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ in genetic oscillators*, Vilar et al., PNAS 2002).  Here, we
 simulate this model from `t=0` to `t=200`, reporting the state at
 time intervals of `1` time unit.
 
-![Vilar oscillator benchmark](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/master/benches/vilar/vilar.png)
+![Vilar oscillator benchmark](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/main/benches/vilar/vilar.png?raw=true)
 
 We can see that rebop's macro DSL is the fastest of all, both in
 time per simulation, and with compilation time included.  The second
diff --git a/src/lib.rs b/src/lib.rs
index 2b2b6e2..f5c447d 100644
--- a/src/lib.rs
+++ b/src/lib.rs
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@
 //!
 //! which can produce an output similar to this one:
 //!
-//! ![Typical SIR output](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/master/sir.png)
+//! ![Typical SIR output](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/main/sir.png?raw=true)
 //!
 //! # Python bindings
 //!
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
 //! simulate this model from `t=0` to `t=200`, reporting the state at
 //! time intervals of `1` time unit.
 //!
-//! ![Vilar oscillator benchmark](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/master/benches/vilar/vilar.png)
+//! ![Vilar oscillator benchmark](https://github.com/Armavica/rebop/blob/main/benches/vilar/vilar.png?raw=true)
 //!
 //! We can see that rebop's macro DSL is the fastest of all, both in
 //! time per simulation, and with compilation time included.  The second