Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dereplicated viral contigs as input #8

Open
asierFernandezP opened this issue Dec 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Dereplicated viral contigs as input #8

asierFernandezP opened this issue Dec 18, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@asierFernandezP
Copy link

Hi,

I was wondering whether you recommend to dereplicate and filter viral contigs identified by viral sorting tools like VIBRANT, VirSorter2, etc. before running PropagAtE or if you recommend to use the viral contigs without any dereplication step as input (you recommend to use the VIBRANT coordinates file - or a manually generated one - as input for PropagAtE, so I understand that you use directly the viral contigs identified by VIBRANT without any additional steps).

Thanks in advance,

Asier

@KrisKieft
Copy link
Member

Hi,

It depends on the data that you have. If you have viruses from a single sample then the assembly step should have incorporated a sufficient level of dereplication and you should be good to run Propagate. If you have multiple samples pooled together then you may have viruses with 100% similar sequences. If you have identical pooled viruses then it can mess with the mapping step and I'd suggest dereplicating or mapping separately.

@asierFernandezP
Copy link
Author

In this case I have multiple samples, so I will pool the viral contigs, dereplicate them and use them as input for Propagate.

Thanks a lot!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants