New/Updated Attribute types

[jonkjetiloye]

Description

As we need add additional attributes for more information describing an entity (e.g. ) as a set of attributes we see a need to establish a naming convention for our attribute-types in the URN format.

We also want to be as consistent as possible across DigDir in our use of the URN format, which has sparked a discussion with Dialogporten and ID-Porten in the format to use for Organization numbers and National Identity numbers.

Old	New
urn:altinn:ssn	urn:altinn:person:identifier-no
urn:altinn:organizationnumber	urn:altinn:organization:identifier-no

Type	Values
urn:altinn:entity:type	person organization enterpriseuser systemuser(TBD)

This format will allow us to add additional and different sets of attribute types depending on the type of entity

Entity	Attributes
urn:altinn:person	urn:altinn:person:identifier-no urn:altinn:person:uuid urn:altinn:person:name:shortname urn:altinn:person:name:firstname urn:altinn:person:name:middlename urn:altinn:person:name:lastname
urn:altinn:organization	urn:altinn:organization:identifier-no urn:altinn:organization:uuid urn:altinn:organization:name
urn:altinn:enterpriseuser	urn:altinn:enterpriseuser:username urn:altinn:enterpriseuser:uuid urn:altinn:enterpriseuser:organization:uuid
urn:altinn:systemuser(TBD)	urn:altinn:systemuser:uuid urn:altinn:systemuser:name

Additional Information

Slack:
Discussion with Bjørn & Jørgen (Dialogporten & ID-Porten):
https://altinndevops.slack.com/archives/CE5E06MC7/p1699002893027499

Team discussion about response model for delegations:
https://altinndevops.slack.com/archives/CQPNM75L3/p1704368339145839

Tasks

Tasks

Preview Give feedback

1. Resource Rights Registry ??
2. Access Management: Entity Attribute Resolver altinn-access-management#577
   kind/user-story +1
   
3. Access Management BFF & Frontend:
4. Altinn 2: Checked and not found use of old orgno/ssn identifiers
5. Events: Organizationnumber?
6. PEP: Support for both legacy and new orgno indentifier in parallel

Acceptance Criterias

No response