Suggestion: let people know about how better Cuda can handle mass replace now #5429
Replies: 5 comments 1 reply
-
Wiki - i am going to add the new topic to https://wiki.freepascal.org/CudaText_VS_other_editors#CudaText_performance , as copy/paste of your 1st/2nd paragraph from this issue. you can improve the 1st post (e.g. menition more apps?) or leave it as is.. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Oh, please add versions of apps! Linux versions are often not latest, becase packaging takes time.
What RAM does your PC have? what CPU? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Added here: https://wiki.freepascal.org/CudaText_VS_other_editors#Performance_of_mass_replace_in_huge_lines Will think how/where to add to the homepage |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Added Wiki additional URL to the homepage, to the bottom of main page |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I compared a few editors in the task of replacing 25K single-char matches by two-chars-string in a 1.5MB file with a line with 800K chars. Running on x64 Linux. Results:
When you have time, I suggest you to write a note about that in CudaText VS other editors, maybe even write a word about great speed/performance in stressful cases (mass replace in big file, handling big lines and big files) in Cuda's website, as this being one of its features/advantages.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions