-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 236
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix 589, Adding AlmaLinux support - config, scripts, document changes #592
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Bala Raman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bala Raman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bala Raman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bala Raman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Bala Raman <[email protected]>
@gdams - I think I'm OK with landing this here - I know at Adoptium we'll have a reduced set. |
|
I have docker file changes ready to go. I can request new PR for docker files when current PR is approved and merged. https://github.com/srbala/openjdk-docker/tree/fix-589-pr2 |
ping @gdams for confirmation on the above.
@karianna I'm personally a little nervous about adding something we potentially won't support going forward (which isn't far away!) :-\ |
Yeah, maybe one to ask the PMC (should we support this). |
Holding off for now. See adoptium/containers#1 |
The question here is rather what will be a replacement of a current CentOS docker image; although CentOS 8 is going to limp towards the end of 2021 with RPM updates, as of 2021-07-21 they haven't published 8.4 update, so users are stuck with unsupported 8.3 image from December 2020. |
This Pull reqeust addes AlmaLinux as one of the suppoted OSs. Resolves #589.
It contains the changes required for config files, shell scripts, test scripts and documentaion.
Docker files change will be added as seperated PR. This way code review will be cleaner.