You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Current build, and complies there are numerous warnings about not implementing ConfigBuilder.
Having familiar, and accessible ways to configure the server-side part of the application will go a long way towards adoption once we finally get to test releases, and beyond.
There are two crates that I personally feel would be good fits.
BanjoFox
changed the title
Implement a new crate for server-side configuration management.
TODO: Implement a new crate for server-side configuration management.
Oct 12, 2024
Current build, and complies there are numerous warnings about not implementing
ConfigBuilder
.Having familiar, and accessible ways to configure the server-side part of the application will go a long way towards adoption once we finally get to test releases, and beyond.
There are two crates that I personally feel would be good fits.
config
-- Seems to be the "go-to" config crate for maximum flexibility.https://docs.rs/config/latest/config/
toml_env
- Similar flexibility, advertised as low-dependency crate.https://docs.rs/toml-env/latest/toml_env/
I am open to other crates though. There are certainly some tempting ones linked in the
toml_env
docs.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: