New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

PSA: missing test coverage for BUFFER_TOO_SMALL #200

Open

gilles-peskine-arm opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 3 comments

Labels

enhancement good first issue Jira status: REOPENED mirrored type: enhancement

Collaborator

gilles-peskine-arm commented Aug 2, 2019

Description

We mostly don't test what psa_xxx functions do if they write output to a buffer and that buffer is too small.

Example bug (wrong error code): #199

For all API functions that take an output buffer, there should be at least one test that expects PSA_ERROR_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL with parameters that are correct except for one output buffer which is too small.

Issue request type

[ ] Question
[x] Enhancement
[ ] Bug

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

gilles-peskine-arm added the enhancement label

ciarmcom added type: enhancement Jira status: OPEN mirrored labels

Member

ciarmcom commented Aug 2, 2019

Internal Jira reference: https://jira.arm.com/browse/IOTCRYPT-849

ciarmcom closed this as completed

ciarmcom added Jira status: CLOSED and removed Jira status: OPEN labels

ARMmbed deleted a comment from ciarmcom

adbridge commented Nov 4, 2019

Apologies, this was closed in error by the automated bot - re-opening.

adbridge reopened this

ciarmcom added Jira status: REOPENED and removed Jira status: CLOSED labels

yanesca added the good first issue label

Collaborator

yanesca commented Mar 16, 2020

Like with other similar issues, any improvement to the current state is welcome.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment