You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have tested the parallel efficiency of the function cacheNeighborInfo used by the function fillNeighborsCPU
When the number of particles exceeds one million, cacheNeighborInfo in 32 cores consumes even longer time than that in 8 cores CPU. I wonder if it is because the function cacheNeighborInfo are written in OpenMP way instead of MPI. The same thing happens in the function Redistribute. Here is part of codes in cacheNeighborInfo:
Hi everyone,
I have tested the parallel efficiency of the function
cacheNeighborInfo
used by the functionfillNeighborsCPU
When the number of particles exceeds one million,
cacheNeighborInfo
in 32 cores consumes even longer time than that in 8 cores CPU. I wonder if it is because the functioncacheNeighborInfo
are written in OpenMP way instead of MPI. The same thing happens in the functionRedistribute
. Here is part of codes incacheNeighborInfo
:I would be appreciate if you can give me some help.
Best wishes,
Yifeng He
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: