You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're getting large numbers of marker annotations with names "point1".."point100".
Due to the large number of markers zinc groups are no longer made for each marker point.
Idea is to make one annotation group for the whole class of markers "point", or better still properly name and link to anatomical terms, and to define an integer ID field to store the unique number.
Issue is that marker point data for fitting would need to be matched as now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're getting large numbers of marker annotations with names "point1".."point100".
Due to the large number of markers zinc groups are no longer made for each marker point.
Idea is to make one annotation group for the whole class of markers "point", or better still properly name and link to anatomical terms, and to define an integer ID field to store the unique number.
Issue is that marker point data for fitting would need to be matched as now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: